Pumping Costs:

unicipal design standards conservatively dictate that a septic system be sized to handle 150 gallons per day per bedroom (which equates to 2 people per bedroom using 75 gallons per day each). Through the use of flow restrictors on the sinks/showers, low volume flush toilets, and the optimum utilization of the dishwater and washing machine (washing only full loads), the flow rates can be significantly reduced, perhaps as low as 35 gallons per day per person. Since approximately 40% of the wastewater generated on a daily basis comes from flushing toilets, anything which can be done to reduce toilet flushing will have a significant impact. The installation of composting toilets, or urinals would be an extreme example of the steps one could take to reduce wastewater volume. For more information on these types of systems, go to the Equaris homepage.

ecause the homeowner must pay for the removal and disposal of every gallon of wastewater, it is imperative that water conservation be practiced. The cost to pump a tank will vary depending upon the size of the tank, the location in Anchorage, and the season of the year. For a 4 person family, served by a 4000 gallon holding tank, assuming 40 gallons per person per day, the tank will have to be pumped every 25 days. This corresponds to 15 pumpings per year (assume $165/each) for a total annual cost of $2,475.

Something to Consider:

lthough the cost of operating a holding tank may be more than a conventional, or alternative technology system, it is not necessarily more expensive to own when one considers the capital and operating costs combined. A further consideration is the fact that the operational life of the alternative technology systems in unknown at this time. Perhaps their life will be no longer than conventional septic systems (9-10 years in the Anchorage area!). In short, the owners of such systems will have periodic repairs (new pumps, air compressors, electrical components, etc.) as well as the possibility of having to upgrade portions of the system, such as the drainfield.

olding tanks, unlike septic systems, have no components to fail, other then the alarm, and their useful life expectancy is about 20 years (the tank eventually rusts out and starts to leak). The only costs associated with owning a holding tank is the original capital cost, and the monthly pumping costs. When these costs are weighed against some of the higher priced alternative systems, it becomes clear that holding tanks are perhaps unjustly stigmatized. Another redeeming quality regarding holding tanks is that they, unlike septic systems, are 100% reliable.

f you find yourself in the position of marketing a home with a holding tank, perhaps the most important thing you can do is educate your clients regarding the economics of operating a holding tank and weigh those costs against the capital costs associated with conventional and alternative on-site systems. In many cases, you will find that a holding tank is the most economical solution.